Political Literacy

Poland: The Impact of Political Stability on the Political Participation (OLD)

In my previous blog, I talked about how the political participation of the Polish citizens had an impact on the level of democracy. However, it can also be looked at the other way around: How does the political instability in Poland affect the political participation of citizens.

What are the reasons for this political instability?

I found that this political instability can be seen in the elections of 2015, when the Law and Justice party became the first single-party government after the fall of the communist regime in 1989. First of all, it was very unusual that the previous government was voted out of office, since they brought positive economic results forth. In addition, the elected party was considered to be national-conservative, very Eurosceptic and brought the public media and the Constitutional Tribunal under the control of the government.

Now let me tell you, the political instability in Poland did not just occur after the elections in 2015 but have existed since the communist regime took over control after the end of World War II. This permanent instability is caused by the legitimacy crisis. The degree of government legitimacy determines the citizens’ support for politics, which is based on similarity of norms and values of the citizens and government. In Poland, this discrepancy between the norms and values led to a legitimacy crisis which the government faces.

How does this political instability influence political participation?

As I explained in the previous paragraph, citizens’ support is based on their norms and values. These norms and values, along with other factors such as habits, history and culture, are factors that determine the political action. When these factors are in discrepancy with the norms and values of the Polish government, citizens are less likely to participate in politics. I found that when the norms and values of citizens are so deeply rooted in religion, that only the church could motivate them to participate in the political debate.

Furthermore, the fragmented party system of Poland was caused by the legitimacy crisis. This fragmentation caused confusion of the Polish voters. In addition, as I discussed in my previous blog, the low belief in the political system also caused widespread cynicism among Polish citizens. These factors resulted in a low degree of voter turn-out during the elections.

In addition, I found that the weakness and instability of the Polish government caused social fractures. Moreover, the economic reforms of the government resulted in the polarization, social fractures and divisions among Polish citizens. This break of the middle class, who were the most political active, resulted in a decline in voter turn-out.

Moreover, as I discussed in this blog and my colleague discussed in her blog, the low participation rates are the result of restriction of free public media and the restriction of free speech. Therefore, as my colleague states, there is no environment to improve the political literacy for Polish citizens.

Therefore, I can conclude that the low political literacy due to the restrictions of the government, the legitimacy crisis of the political party-system and the widespread cynicism, which are all aspects of political instability, had a negative impact on the political participation of Polish citizens.